Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky has said the death of Yevgeny Prigozhin – the Russian mercenary leader whose plane crashed weeks after he led a mutiny against Moscow’s military leadership – shows what happens when people make deals with Russian leader Vladimir Putin.

As Ukraine’s counteroffensive moves into a fourth month, with only modest gains to show so far, Zelensky told CNN’s Fareed Zakaria he rejected suggestions it was time to negotiate peace with the Kremlin.

“When you want to have a compromise or a dialogue with somebody, you cannot do it with a liar,” Volodymyr Zelensky said.

  • @tomatopathe@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    49
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    So from having had a few exchanges with pro Russian accounts on Lemmy (which seems to be infested with a few very active ones) this is a summary of their arguments:

    • “Ukraine is Nazi”
    • “Well far right parties got a total of under 6% of the vote, and they elected a Jewish man president”
    • “yeah but Bandera and whatabout America”

    • “Ukraine killed ethnic Russians”
    • “A huge percentage of their population are ethnic Russians, including in government, and they are fine, and were until the Russian invasion. And now it’s Russia that has killed, maimed and raped more ethnic Russians, including civilians, than Ukraine every did or even could. Including their own people thorough incompetence and corruption”.
    • “Yeah but Bandera, and whatabout America”

    • “Ukraine is fighting because they are forced to by their colonial masters, the USA and NATO, and Ukrainians will keep dying so long as they keep being armed”
    • “Actually > 90% of the population wants to continue fighting for their country back, so what you’re basically saying is you think Ukrainians should be abandoned to Russian enslavement”
    • “Yeah but Bandera, and whatabout America”

    • “NATO and USA are colonialists and this is just more colonialism”
    • “Actually both Russia and China are actual, bone fide land empires, with ethnic minorities that are forced to live like colonized people - including doing the fighting for Russia while their families back home live in misery and squalor and Putin’s Mafia collect mansions, private jets and yachts”
    • “Yeah but Bandera, and whatabout America”
      • @fiah@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        13
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        they’re on other instances as well

        edit: having to go through posts like these and blocking all the invader apologists isn’t fun, but it beats accidentally reading their drivel again

        • @Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          132 years ago

          I’m sure some are on a payroll. You don’t get a weird narrative like that started without planting a seed.

          It’s not a coincidence they look like a better version of 2015 the_donald.

          They even mocked me when I said I expected to get banned for saying that… and then banned me. Weird how that works.

      • @zephyreks@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        02 years ago

        Didn’t lemmy.ca defed with Hexbear because someone called (in jest) for death to landlords while Canada experiences it’s biggest housing crisis ever and rents are rising rapidly YoY solely because landlords, who otherwise deliver no intrinsic value in their position, found a way to make more money from the increased demand?

        • @rbesfe@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          13
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          No, that wasn’t the reason and if it’s the only one you can think of you have no idea how toxic and disgusting the hexbear community is. I hate landlords too but these people are really taking it so much further than joking about dead landlords.

          • @zephyreks@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            -42 years ago

            That was one of the big reasons made in the post about Hexbear defed.

            The other ones were nebulous concerns about Hexbear comments in other instances… Which, by definition, is the responsibility of those other instances.

    • @roastpotatothief@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      -15
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      That all sounds like brigading emotional nonsense. In fact, there were strong reasons for Russia to invade. It is probably true that Russia was manipulated into invading, it had no choice because of strategic decisions made by Ukraine. It’s a shame none of the people you talked to were able to argue the issues sensibly.

    • @zephyreks@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      02 years ago

      There’s a reason Western Europe focuses on the Nazis in the context of the Holocaust: the Nazis never saw the Western Europeans as a stain on the Earth like they did the Jews and the Slavs. Russians don’t need to point to Jews to claim Nazism: they can point directly to the treatment of ethnically Russian Slavs during WW2 and the plans that Nazi Germany had for the eradication of Slavs.

      Russia doesn’t need to point at how Ukraine treats Jews because to Russia, the Holocaust is dwarfed in societal impact by the issues that motivated Operation Barbarossa. The Russians lost 19 million Russian civilians in the war, why would they care about the Jews?

      Nevermind that minorities in China get so many advantages it’s actually silly how much affirmative action goes on. Provinces dominated by minorities get significantly more funding per capita and even get loss-leading infrastructure projects like the Tibet and Xinjiang railways. Students from minorities get additional bonuses on gaokao (basically SAT, but imagine if schools didn’t look at anything else). Minorities are exempt from family planning policies and get massive interest-free loans for starting businesses. They get proportional representation in government. Hell, there are 55 minority groups in China making up 8% of the population.

      In the army? The prevalence of rural populations in the army has been observed AROUND THE WORLD. It’s a function of rural communities being rather poor and underserved by governments in general, as well as the lack of economic opportunities that living on a farm provides. In fact, the entire notion of the underserved countryside is what allowed communism to rise in Russia and China.

      • TheLurker
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        Oh yeah CCP is all about diversity and minorities right?

        I mean just ask the people of Tibet, or the Uyghurs right? They will tell you how much the Chinese government supports their minority culture.

        Filthy fucking genocidal cunts. That’s what the Chinese Communist Party is. And your attempt to create a positive spin of them is not as subtle as you think.

        Tankie scum!

        • @zephyreks@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          -22 years ago

          Have you ever been to China? Ever talked to a person from a Chinese minority? Clearly not.

          By and large their complaints are about a lack of economic opportunity (because, y’know, Inner Mongolia isn’t exactly the most hospitable climate) and that the government affirmative action isn’t enough to address the gap in resources. That’s what you’ll hear on the ground… And that’s an absolutely fair concern.

          • @krakenmat@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            62 years ago

            I have. I’ve known Tibetans personally and I can assure you that they wish China had never invaded their country and taken it over.

            • @zephyreks@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Ah yes, because Tibet before the CCP was a bastion of human rights protection. Who do you think you’re convincing?

              Still, clearly never been to China 🤷‍♀️

              • @krakenmat@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                Well it’s sure as shit not a bastion of human rights after the CCP invasion.

                You’ve clearly never met a Tibettan refugee.

                • @zephyreks@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 years ago

                  Do you understand Tibetan history up to that point? At least it’s no longer a serfdom system (which Tibetan advocates will say was equal because of the one-in-a-million chance that one of the peasants can become the Dalai Lama and that everyone was totally happy because everyone was working towards bettering Buddhism). How many Tibetan refugees do you know who experienced serfdom?

                  • @krakenmat@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    12 years ago

                    The Tibetans should get to chose their government, not a communist dictatorship of a foreign country who undertook a military invasion and then practiced cultural and ethnic eradication in Tibet. If the Mao had not lied to the leadership of Tibet, and the chinese communists had not invaded, Tibet would most likely be a peaceful democracy now, as is the democratically elected government in exile. How’s China going? Hold up a poster of Winnie the Poo in Beijing and let me know how you go.

          • TheLurker
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Fuck off idiot, don’t try to push a narrative that I’m nieve or uninformed. The persecution of minorities in China under the oppressive CCP is well documented and none of your tankie bullshit will change that.

            I don’t care how much revisionism, whataboutism, alternative facts, or straight up propaganda you throw at this, the fact remains the CCP is an oppressive, genocidal and brutal regime run by cunts.

            And you in support of said cunts makes you a cunt. I don’t like people who act like cunts. So fuck you!

            • @zephyreks@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              So… I’ll take that as a no?

              No first party sources, no evidence, and probably has never left a NATO country. Truly a well-informed opinion.

      • @Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Improved infrastructure and better access to education is not the win you think it is. Whether infrastructure and education is good or not depends on what you do with it. If you use your infrastructure to connect unruly provinces to your center of power in an effort to better exert control, then the infrastructure becomes a net-negative for the people on the receiving end. As an example, I’m sure nobody sane enough would claim that the US building the railroad was positive for native americans. Likewise, if you use your education to indoctrinate people, then better educational opportunities go hand in hand with increased oppression.

          • @Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            I didn’t say that at all. What I did say is that you shouldn’t take China providing infrastructure and education as a purely philantrophic endeavour.

            • @zephyreks@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              improved infrastructure and better access to education is not the win you think it is

              What exactly do you think you’re saying? That infrastructure and education are bad?

              • @Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                minorities in China get so many advantages it’s actually silly how much affirmative action goes on

                You claim China is engaging in affirmative action to strengthen its minorities. I’m pointing out that the actions China is taking can just as easily be turned against the minorities you claim are helped by China.

                • @zephyreks@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 years ago

                  The actions such as… Giving them additional points on gaokao? Interest free business loans? Exemption from family planning policy? The horror.

      • Gyoza Power
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        The Russians lost 19 million Russian civilians in the war, why would they care about the Jews?

        Nevermind the fact that it was Russia itself that treated (and keeps treating) its soldiers as cannon fodder

        • @zephyreks@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          72 years ago

          I’d recommend that you read a more insightful commentary on Red Army practices during WW2 rather than following Nazi propaganda from that period. David Glantz’ work is particularly insightful.

          Either way, those are 19 million civilians. That isn’t military dead, that’s civilians.

          • @tomatopathe@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            -12 years ago

            One thing they always forget to mention is the USSR was allied to Nazi Germany in order to partition Poland.

            No doubt the Soviets suffered greatly in WW2, and contributed greatly to the allied victory. On the other hand they did not do it alone, and they certainly did not expect to have to fight the Germans at all, at least not at that point.

            • @zephyreks@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              62 years ago

              So? The Great Powers had decided on a policy of appeasement against Nazi Germany. What exactly would you have proposed the USSR do? They signed the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact prior to the war for a reason.

              Without the Eastern Front, Europe was lost. Hitler only launched Operation Barbarossa because he thought the Western Front was all but won. Continental Europe was under German control and the UBoats were locking down most of the Atlantic, meanwhile imports of Russian materials was sustaining the German war economy (similarly, imports of American materials was sustaining Japan’s war in China and the Pacific)… Of course, it turns out that dividing your forces and taking on Russia in the winter aren’t the best ideas, but at the time Germany wanted energy independence and the Caucasus was seen as an easier target than the Middle East (which at the time out produced Romania but wasn’t yet the oil superpower it is today).

              • @tomatopathe@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                -4
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                That’s all well and good, but that’s never taught at all to Russians and ignored by tankies.

                And if you actually read your dumb narrative, your first paragraph is contradicted by your second. You really need to work on your story.

                Here’s the truth: the USSR, like Nazi Germany, was an authoritarian expansionist nightmare that was happy to get Poland for free. They only fight the Nazis because they had to. And Stalin was a shit strategist.

      • @tomatopathe@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        25% ish of the Russian population live in huts and shit in holes in outhouses for a lack of plumbing (mostly ethnic minorities), all while the ruling Mafia collects yachts and private jets, and launches wars.

        I’m not saying there isn’t wealth inequality elsewhere, but how about a bit of perspective here. Russia cannot actually conscript too many ethnic Russians or use them as cannon fodder, since that is the only ethnicity in Russia that matters politically, since they are the middle class. Instead they send the colonized people, who happen to be those who shit in holes for a lack of plumbing.

    • @ImmortanStalin@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      -22 years ago

      How were their ethnic Russians fine when this shit was happening?

      I’d ask you to cite your sources but this is all sensationalized. Also, nice summary on Bandera, and the Azov fighters everyone keeps shuffling around to parliaments and fundraisers.

      If you’re all so blood thirsty go put some skin in the game.

          • @nonailsleft@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            -12 years ago

            No I mean armed insurrection taking over government buildings at gunpoint.

            I don’t know what country you’re from but I don’t think there are many that are going to keep the kids gloves on for long in such a situation

            • Pili
              link
              fedilink
              02 years ago

              Yes, when there was insurection in France and the Paris Commune was created, the government sent the army and killed everyone.

              It was a bad thing when France did it, and it was also a bad thing when Ukraine did it. Monarchists and fascists are just equally disgusting.

              • @nonailsleft@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                Yeah I’m sure if you go through human history you can find some insurrections you support and others you don’t :)

                Perhaps you’ll want to pick another example though, as this particular one was started because their government capitulated to a foreign invader while Parisians wanted to fight. So just a little bit of irony there