Merriam Webster’s response: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s166nC_hiZ0
- 3 Posts
- 88 Comments
Ah yes, he’s on the show with the very tall and smart scientist Dr Rogan /s
lobut@lemmy.cato
Science Memes@mander.xyz•Harvard Places Math Professor Martin Nowak on Paid Administrative Leave Over Epstein TiesEnglish
531·3 months agoThese people need to be put underneath the school.
Yes, I sound “barbaric” and we’re a society of laws and all that, but it seems we’re obviously not. This information was just sat on, fucking disgusting people.
Yeah, I agree with Weird Al, you USE the NET to find a legal way but we’ll just have to wait for Roku.
Reminds me of David Mitchell’s Rant Against Christmas (Christmasland Rant): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxeDQv4lE-o
lobut@lemmy.cato
Games@sh.itjust.works•Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 takes home an absurd 9 wins at The Game Awards, more than Baldur's Gate 3 in 2023English
1·6 months agodeleted by creator
Some say you don’t need it, but I personally use this plugin: https://github.com/jeffreytse/zsh-vi-mode
but I also use this: https://github.com/zdharma-continuum/fast-syntax-highlighting for syntax highlighting and it makes it more readable too.
I’ve always liked vim but one thing that I really loved about it was when I started using vim mode in zsh.
Being able to just navigate through commands in my terminal and easily highlight and edit and all that … it’s so good.
lobut@lemmy.cato
Star Trek Social Club@startrek.website•"The hope is to have a fresh 'Star Trek' movie, though [Paramount] has moved on from the idea of bringing back Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto and the rest of the ensemble from the J.J. Abrams reboot."English
61·7 months agoI really liked Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto and enjoyed the first two movies. The first one far more than the second though.
The second had what I felt were unnecessary linked to their prequels and it’s also what the worst parts of Craig’s Bond and Solo were as well.
I don’t think they embodied the spirit of Star Trek though, but I was hoping they could have worked those out over time, but it seems not so much.
lobut@lemmy.cato
Science Memes@mander.xyz•THE NEXT CLANKER BETTER DO MY GODDAMN DISHESEnglish
3·10 months agoI understand all of that, but my parents that won’t move of my house will absolutely not use them. They’d rather sit there with the water running for hours while they watch soaps.
lobut@lemmy.cato
Science Memes@mander.xyz•THE NEXT CLANKER BETTER DO MY GODDAMN DISHESEnglish
7·10 months agoLooks like it’s from the late great Michael Brooks

lobut@lemmy.cato
Programming@programming.dev•Worktrees: Git's best kept secret (and why you should use them) | Tom Ups
14·10 months agoYeah, I didn’t see the use for them until I got further into it over just cloning. Your worktree “folders” share the same git history and stuff. So you can stash in one and apply in the other. If you do a fetch in one, it fetches for all of them.
Whether it’s worth it for others to learn these just for those things is hard to say. I picked it up simply because I was bored and wanted to pick up a new “thing”.
That’s because you need to do things like stay hydrated, eat a healthy diet and keep your cell division count as low as possible.
lobut@lemmy.cato
Science Memes@mander.xyz•so this is how you catch the gay virus!English
51·1 year agoObligatory Scott Pilgrim clip: https://youtu.be/MxQlpeD4EKc
I think you can do
const thing = ... as constto lock down the mutation?
lobut@lemmy.cato
Science Memes@mander.xyz•Hertz, showing the difference between science and engineeringEnglish
47·1 year agoThere’s a good NPR podcast in the same vein as this: https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2017/06/21/533840751/episode-779-shrimp-fight-club
It’s about congressman talking about government waste and targeting the sciences. It’s like, you don’t get the “cool” applications without the “weird” research. I’m doing a horrible job describing it, but I thought it was a good listen.
lobut@lemmy.caOPto
Atheism@lemmy.world•Jordan Peterson vs 20 Atheists | SurroundedEnglish
32·1 year agoI feel as though Jordan Peterson got outplayed a lot here and his dodging of questions and stuff exposed his charlatanism (word?). So I don’t think he beat them.
I do love the quote. Although I also love the wrestling with the pig one, where you both get muddy but the pig enjoys it :)
[edit] thanks for more downvotes! [/edit]
lobut@lemmy.caOPto
Atheism@lemmy.world•Jordan Peterson vs 20 Atheists | SurroundedEnglish
3·1 year agoThere was 1 atheist vs 20 Christians, I can’t remember the lads name but I thought he did great. What’s funny is how many Christians disagree on their interpretations with one another.
They have done formats such as: leftist, liberal, conservative and MAGA supporter as well.
I don’t think these types of debates (especially this format) change minds? However, I’m slowly dipping in and out to listen to those who disagree with him. Sadly people like Peterson are charlatans so there’s no point as he’s paid not to agree and there’s nothing to learn.
lobut@lemmy.caOPto
Atheism@lemmy.world•Jordan Peterson vs 20 Atheists | SurroundedEnglish
61·1 year agoI’ve listened to JPs early stuff and thought he had some good points back then. Then he went down a strange path and I didn’t follow his stuff.
I’ve heard him talk about Christian values and defends them a lot and how they’re superior and stuff especially with the 1 man 1 woman stuff. The problem is that he’s not being up front about it. He argues about the word: “belief” here rather than answer if he believes in God. Like, that’s just the worst.
JP is a snake and if you can’t stand him, don’t watch this because it’ll do you no good. Even when he gets dunked on it’s likely not satisfying enough to overcome his repellent nature.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STBNDB4GNUs