Yes, and ‘pressure’ is used similarly. Think atmospheric pressure. It can lower and heighten, so a lack of pressure is low pressure, not the absence of it.
- 0 Posts
- 169 Comments
Tl:dr = Because they haven’t. Yet. Maybe. As far as we know.
I think you’ve described it quite well. That’s just evolutionary biology. Any adaptation requires some kind of pressure behind it.
Probably. It becomes a greater concern for wherever they go to the bathroom afterwards.
I can’t speak for all cats, as in felines, but domesticated house cats that humans keep as pets are derived from a desert cat originally. Not many desert fish for their digestive systems to have adapted to.
Kibble was ‘invented’ during ww2 as a way to get around shortages on metal for canning. But it’s essentially pemmican with below human grade standards. Works fine for dogs, manages to work well enough for cats to survive, so an industry was born even when the material shortages ended.
They don’t particularly like fish nor do they digest it well.
It is however extremely stinky and is typically the meatiest, fleshiest material they eat when they otherwisr have a life of kibble or canned foods. And for that reason they tend to ravenously enjoy tunafish.
ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.worksto
Space@mander.xyz•Scientists Just Found All 5 Genetic “Letters” of DNA and RNA on an Asteroid
1·21 days agoAlso did biology with evolutionary biology upper division coursework. Part of the reason astrobiology seeks for signs of water is that water is the known common factor of earthbound life.
The portion I remember about extremeophiles also looked at the perched lakes under antarctica. As I remember there IS a degree of mineralization that takes place in those lakes as stromatalite formations by proteobacteria.
Essentially if there’s water and any kind of radiation around minerals then the building blocks for life start to appear.
Water+mineral+radiation = Life, maybe? (Maybe divided by time/luck?)
C&C needs to reboot ant mode.
Kind of. It isn’t wrong, but it is a crucial omission that it’s interviewing a former EPA enforcement guy (i.e. not current) about current enforcement policy, (which is radically changing under Zeldin.) So the model’s interpretation on whether the state will hold to federal pressure becomes imprecise since it’s really this guy stating there’s actually a lack of federal pressure.
But it does rightfully note information is not in the article to answer, which is neat.
Because… for context not directly in the article, technically if EPA defers to the state, then Mississippi saying temporary permit exemption actually applies here satisfies the permit requirement, which Buckheit has to know. (Which directly explains the lack of federal pressure.) Citing the policy in January was a clever non-answer from the EPA. They’re actually saying state and federal policies are NOT in conflict.
Also, I’m not trying to dismiss any of this, more trying to provide an insight that might help with accuracy. I have a bit of knowledge on this specific subject, so I thought I’d note a point where I can measure an inaccuracy.
These kinda of articles can be really sneaky about claims and statements. Mostly minor and innocuous, but an LLM doesn’t know the difference. Like, this caught that Buckheit is talking about what should be happening under previous admins when he was involved, but that’s specifically not what the EPA is doing anymore, which the LLM appears to have missed in part. Which to me, that part was the primary purpose of the article.
“List the article’s concrete claims about permit status and turbine operations, each with support.”
- EPA position: these turbines require permits under the Clean Air Act.
Not quite though. The article cited EPA’s policy as per a former EPA enforcement staffer who was explicitly stating the EPA is not requiring that here and has made rules deferring to the state and local authorities. The guy was saying the EPA should be acting, but isn’t. The article was clever with it, but that’s all the more reason.
ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.worksto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•might be a form of Jevons Paradox
3·4 months agoI always have to remind myself being able to stream audio from a cellphone while driving across a city is also a pretty crazy development.
ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.worksto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•might be a form of Jevons Paradox
3·4 months agoTVs became SmartTVs and now need the internet to turn on. The TVs need an OS now to internet to do TV.
Antennae broadcast TV seems like an ancient magic.
Congratulations!
From,

ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.worksto
United States | News & Politics@midwest.social•Kristi Noem abruptly ends press conference when asked about CBP shooting down a party balloon forcing airport closure
4·5 months agoWe don’t like them balloons. Was the balloon chinese like the last one?
ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.worksto
Science Memes@mander.xyz•Nope, not visiting thatEnglish
32·5 months agoThat’s generally how people find out. Until then, it is both at the same time. Schroedinger’s douchebag and all.
ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.worksto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Fun fact: you can't upload this image on piefed.socialEnglish
231·6 months agoLooks like Piefed really is Lemmy with SpezTools.
ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.worksto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Fun fact: you can't upload this image on piefed.socialEnglish
11·6 months agocurrent_user.reputation -= 1
So what exactly is going on there?




The design is very tree.