It’s incredible that humanity has done this well
- 0 Posts
- 58 Comments
You can accelerate it into space at g forces which would liquify living beings, perhaps?
We do this with our dog if she get ill. We know she’s not drinking enough water so we but bits of cooked chicken in the bottom of her water bowl. She ends up drinking water accidentally while trying to eat the chicken.
If it were designed properly you wouldn’t need to be good at it, it would be trivial and obvious to do the only thing anyone ever needs to do to their content within an area of the page
Whelks_chance@lemmy.worldto
TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name@lemmy.world•Replace One Word In A Star Trek Quote With Sausage
1·6 months agoTo boldly sausage where noone has gone before.
Whelks_chance@lemmy.worldto
Science Memes@mander.xyz•Can I offer you a nice egg in this trying time? 🥚English
2·7 months agoGlad some people got the reference!
Whelks_chance@lemmy.worldto
Science Memes@mander.xyz•Can I offer you a nice egg in this trying time? 🥚English
5·7 months agoJoanna!
Exactly. I got a drive by downvote which is a shame. Some people are in a situation where they’re happy to take a risk, and know that if it fails they won’t be destitute, and sometimes you might be paid more to account for the risk. Or less, but you get stock options to account for the risk. They’re all valid options as long as you’re not forced into it.
Someone else wrote some code, and he reviewed it and approved it, and merged it into the codebase.
Not sure why this is downvoted. It’s a lifestyle choice that is a genuine choice. You don’t have to live in SF if it’s not for you.
I have the opposite issue with helm charts, where true and false are very, very loosely defined.
This is why I ask for the schema at the same time as asking for (even example) data at the start of a project. Don’t tell me you have the data, give me proof there’s a standardized structure, or the length of the project just tripled.
The fix might be 5 mins. Figuring out wtf was wrong in the first place is the time consuming bit. Especially if the report doesn’t contain a repeatable process to trigger the error condition.
Put it in the backlog and we’ll prioritise it in the next sprint planning. Except we’ve already got a good idea of what’s going in to the next sprint, so we’ll probably get to it in a month. Or two. End of the year tops. Bring it up in the quarterly planning if we haven’t finished it yet, and maybe we can squeeze it in before Q2. Unless the win the ACME project in which case all hands will be on that, so actually plan for it to be in production by Xmas. No, the one after that.
Ducks and birds? What is this magic

Panspermia