• balsoft@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    3 months ago

    I really hope “morging continvoucly” becomes a meme and is used to mock microsoft forever

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    3 months ago

    To be honest, what I’m most mad about isn’t the typoes, it’s that someone generated this image and figured, yeah alright, that will clear things up.

    On some level you want to believe that even if someone does not come up with a proper concept for a visualization, that they still check what the AI shat out, so that it’s at the very least not conceptually wrong and not confusing.

    This image isn’t just shitty, it’s actively worse than having no visualization. They could’ve generated that, chuckled, and not used it. Just how do you blunder your perception check so badly that you decide to include it anyways?

    • ZombieChicken@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      In a proper PnPRPG/Tabletop RPG game, a truly spectacular blunder feels like a success to the person who failed. Walk into a bar and critfail both your Communications check, and the “Oh crap, I failed that badly. Can I save this by doing ______?” follow-up Communications check? You think you did fine, but now the entire bar thinks you are a truly crazy person, and treat you with respect only because they think you’re going to shiv them in the neck if they get out of line.

    • Avicenna@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      That is likely because depending on AI makes you gradually less and less likely to cross-check and verify stuff. For some the whole appeal is the belief that they can get the answer/product they want in a second, ready to go out of the box and without having to spend any mental energy.

  • 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    git Morge perfec t flow for put code in to re\lease! inside very Bronch and Featue code morge continvoucly put code in Git Morge. no problems ever in gitt morge because good Flow and Barnch for code morge conflict of big code releas. Agit Morge yes a place for a code put code in git morge can trust Tirm for giveing good morge to code. friend morge

  • pivot_root@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 months ago

    Well, that explains a lot about the product quality. Their entire development workflow is a complete fucking mess.

    • Long-lived feature branches.
    • Creating merge commits to main just for the sole purpose of tagging them as releases while also maintaining separate release branches.
    • Force-pushing tags to incorporate post-release hotfixes instead of releasing minor patch updates.
    • Taking bugfixes from releases and merging them back into the development branch (have they not heard of cherry-pick?)
    • Always using merges even when a rebase would be easier to follow and keep the history more straightforward.
  • RustyNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I love git flow but the GitHub tooling is bad. It forces you into GitHubflow which is very confusing for those building from source

  • Gonzako@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I just made master become what gets pushed to the actual website so I do have to take it into consideration